A Survey on Behavioral Models of Intra-Household Consumption

Document Type : Conceptual Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. of Economics, Department of Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Economics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran

Abstract

In the theory of microeconomics, in discussions related to consumer behavior, it is usually assumed that the household acts as a decision-making unit like an individual, and for a household, a budget constraint and a utility function are considered. As a result, only the general behavior of the household will be observable and analyzed. Since the 1980s, this method, which is called the Unitary Household Model, has been criticized theoretically and empirically, and issues such as the inequality of household members have been raised. In contrast to the Unitary Household model, Collective Household Model was proposed in consumer behavior. According to this method, in multi-member households, each member has their own preferences, and what can be important between these members is the intra-household bargaining process. In this article, at first, we will give an introduction including the theoretical foundation and the background of the research, then, while introducing the unitary model as an introduction to collective models, we will examine the collective model and inta-household collective models. At the end, the contents are summarized and suggestions for future research are presented.

Keywords

Main Subjects


COPYRIGHTS

©2022 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

Apps, P., & Rees, R. (1996). Labour Supply, Household Production and Intra-Household Welfare Distribution. Journal of Public Economics, 60, 199-219.
Ashworth, J., & Ulph, D. (1981). Household Models In Taxation and Labour Supply. London: George Alien and Unwin, 117-134.
Barten, A., & Bohm, V. (1982). Consumer Theory. Handbook of Mathematical Economics, 2, 381-429.
Becker, G. (1974). A theory of Social Interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6),1063-1093.
Blundell, R., & Robin, J. (2000). Latent Separability: Grouping Goods Without Weak Separability. Econometrica,Econometric Society, 68(1), 53-84.
Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., & Chiappori, P. (2009). Efficient Intra-Household Allocations and Distribution Factors: Implications and Identification. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(2), 503-528.
Browning, M., & Chiappori, P. (1998). Efficient intra-household allocations: a general characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica, 66(6), 1241-1278.
Browning, M., Chiappori, P., & Lechene, V. (2010). Distributional Effects in Household Models: Separate Spheres and Income Pooling. Economic Journal, 120, 786-799.
Chen, Z., & Woolley, F. (2001). A Cournot-Nash Model of Family Decision Making. The Economic Journal, 111(474), 722-748.
Cherchye, L., De rock, B., & Vermeulen, F. (2011). The Revealed Preference Approach to Collective Consumption Behavior: Testing and Sharing Rule Recovery. Review of Economic Studies., 78(1), 176-198.
Cherchye, L., Demuynk, T., & De Rock, B. (2010). Non-Cooperative Household Consumption with Caring,. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Chiappori, P. (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 437-467.
Chiappori, P., Fortin, B., & Lacroix, G. (2011). Marriage market, divorce legislation and household labor supply. Journal of Political Economy.
Deaton, A., & Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.
Dercon, S., & Krishnan, P. (2000). In sickness and in health: Risk-sharing within households in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Political Economy, 108(4), 688-727.
Donni, O. (2003). Collective household labor supply: nonparticipation and income taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1179-1198.
Fortin, B., & Lacroix, G. (1997). A test of the unitary and collective models of household labour supply. Economic Journal, 107, 933-955.
Lundberg, S., Pollak, R., & Walws, T. (1997). Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit. The Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 463-480.
Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis. International Economic Review, 21, 31-44.
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M., & Green, J. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press.
McElroy, M., & Horney, M. (1990). Nash-Bargained Household Decisions: Reply. International Economic Review, 31, 237-242.
Samuelson, P. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Samuelson, P. (1954). The Pure theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387-389.
Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: an inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 635-664.
Vermeulen, F. (2002). Collective Household Models: Principles and Main Results. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.