Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 MBA Alumni, FTMS Global Malaysia, Cyberjaya, Malaysia

2 School of Accounting and Business Management, FTMS Global Malaysia, Cyberjaya, Malaysia

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of workplace coaching on employees’ performance in Malaysia mediated by rewards and recognition. Many studies in the past examined the influence of coaching on employee performance, the relationship between coaching and rewards and recognition, as well as the impact of rewards and recognition on employee performance. However, there is limited research on the influence of coaching and employee performance mediated by rewards and recognition appears to have been conducted or examined.  There is also inadequate literature on the impact of rewards and recognition on coaching. Based on the critical review of research literature, the questionnaire for this research was developed and divided into three sections based on dependent, independent and mediating variables.  In this research, the dependent variable is employee performance, independent variable is coaching, and the mediating variable is rewards and recognition. The conceptual framework is developed using the assumptions of Motivation Theories, Social Exchange Theory, Reinforcement Theory and Psychodynamic Theory. The research used survey approach with a Likert Scale-based survey questionnaire (with 1 to 5 scale – from strongly disagree to strongly agree).  The sampling technique adopted for respondent’s selection is convenient sampling. Total of 200 questionnaires   are distributed to employees in Malaysia who have had experience in being either a coach or a coachee at a workplace. SPSS Amos Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Regression Analysis are used to analyze the data collected. Based on the finding from this research it is found that coaching has a 31.8% positive impact on employee performance, 63.5% positive impact on Rewards, while rewards have a 39.2% impact on employee performance and impact of coaching on employee performance is mediated by rewards has an effect size of 24.9% . Future research should consider looking into other possible mediating factors; consider larger samples looking into different sectors and a different approach in the moderation effect such as demographic profiles of coaches and coachees. The foreseen limitation of this research is the sample size which may not represent the entire workforce population and work sectors in Malaysia. On the other hand, this research has only considered the mediating factors of rewards and recognition while there could be other mediating factors that could influence employee performance. There is also an opportunity in the future to examine different types of coaching and relationship between coach and coachee that may add value to the practical usefulness of the findings.

Keywords

Achi, S. E., & Sleilati, E. (2016). The effect of coaching on employee performance in the human resource management field: the case of the Lebanese banking sector. . International Journal of Trade and Global Markets,, 9(2), 137-169.

Agarwal, R., Angst, C., & Magni, M. (2009). The Performance Effects of Coaching: A Multilevel Analysis Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. The international journal of Human Resource management, 20(10), 2110-2134.
Ali, R., & Ahmed, M. S. (2009). The impact of reward and recognition programs on employee’s motivation and satisfaction: an empirical study. International review of business research papers,, 5(4), 270-279.
Dahlan, S., & Dewasiri, J. (2019). Factors Influencing Employee Performance in Leading COnglomerate in Sri Lanka.
Dawes, J. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. International journal of market research, 50(1), 61-104.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dugguh, S. I., & Dennis, A. (2014). Job satisfaction theories: Traceability to employee performance in organizations. IOSR journal of business and management, 16(5), 11-18.
Dunlop, C. (2017). Council Post: The Success and Failure of The Coaching Industry.
Gettman, H. J., Edinger, S. K., & Wouters, K. (2019). Assessing contracting and the coaching relationship: Necessary infrastructure? International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 17(1).
Grant, A. M. (2009). Workplace, executive and life coaching: An annotated bibliography from the behavioural science and business literature. Coaching Psychology Unit, University of Sydney, Australia.
Grover, S., & Furnham, A. (2016). Coaching as a developmental intervention in organisations: A systematic review of its effectiveness and the mechanisms underlying it. PloS one,. 11(7).
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Babin, B., & Black, W. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective . (Vol. 7).
Hartley, J. (2014). Some thoughts on Likert-type scales. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 14(1), 83-86.
Hays.com.my. (2018). Retrieved from Hays Asia Salary Guide: Malaysian Business Confidence Increases, But Employers Remain Cautious When It Comes to Increasing Headcount and Salaries. .
Henriksen, K., Schinke, R., Moesch, K., McCann, S., Parham, W. D., Larsen, C. H., & Terry, P. (2019). Consensus statement on improving the mental health of high performance athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,, 1-8.
Hussain, S. D., Khaliq, A., Nisar, Q. A., Kamboh, A. Z., & Ali, S. (2019). Impact of Employees’ Recognition, Rewards and Job Stress on Job Performance: Mediating Role of Perceived Organization Support.
Ibrar, M., & Khan, O. (2015). The impact of reward on employee performance (a case study of Malakand Private School). . International letters of social and humanistic sciences, 52, 95-103.
Johns, R. (2010). Likert Items and Scales. Survey Question Bank: Methods Fact Sheet 1 (March 2010).
Jones, R. J., Woods, S. A., & Guillaume, Y. R. (2016). The effectiveness of workplace coaching: A meta‐analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,, 89(2), 249-277.
Khan, M. M., & Jabbar, M. (2013). Determinants of employees performance in corporate sector: Case of an emerging market. Business and Management Research, 2(3), 25-32.
Kline, R. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd Edition). New York and London: The Guilford Press.
Kramer, J., & Chen, J. (2010). Title of the Article. Journal Name, 110-313.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Mansor, N. A., Syafiqah, A. R., Mohamed, A., & Idris, N. (2012). Determinates of coaching culture development: A case study. . Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 485-489.
Mehmood, S., Ramzan, M., & Akbar, M. T. (2013). Managing performance through reward system. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science,, 15(2).
Murphy, B. (2015). The impact of reward systems on employee performance (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin Business School).
Ndungu, D. N. (2017). The Effects of Rewards and Recognition on Employee Performance in Public Educational Institutions: A Case of Kenyatta University, Kenya. Global Journal of Management and Business Research.
Neupane, R. (2015). Effects of coaching and mentoring on employee performance in the UK hotel industry. . International Journal of Social Sciences and Management, 2(2), 123-138.
Payam Gohari, A., & SeyedJafarHosseinipour, M. (2013). Relationship between Rewards and Employee Performance: A Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, , 5(3).
Pousa, C., & Mathieu, A. (2014). The influence of coaching on employee performance: Results from two international quantitative studies. Performance Improvement Quarterly,. 27(3), 75-92.
Qureshi, M. I., Zaman, K., & Shah, I. A. (2010). Relationship between rewards and employee’s performance in the cement industry in Pakistan. Journal of international academic research,, 10(2), 19-29.
Riasat, F., Aslam, S., & Nisar, Q. A. (2016). Do intrinsic and extrinsic rewards influence the job satisfaction and job performance? Mediating role of reward system. Journal of Management Info, 11(1), 16-34.
Rosha, A., & Lace, N. (2016). The scope of coaching in the context of organizational change. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 2.
San Ong, T., & Teh, B. H. (2012). Reward system and performance within Malaysian manufacturing companies. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(7), 1009-1017.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online,, 8(2), 23-74.
Schermuly, C. C., & Graßmann, C. (2019). A literature review on negative effects of coaching–what we know and what we need to know. . Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 12(1), 39-66.
Showkat, N., & Parveen, H. (2017). Non-probability and probability sampling. Media and Communications Study,, 1-9.
Talukder, K. I., & Jan, M. T. (2017). Factors Influencing Sales Peoples Performance: A Study of Mobile Service Providers in Bangladesh. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal.
Tessema, M. T., Ready, K. J., & Embaye, A. B. (2013). The effects of employee recognition, pay, and benefits on job satisfaction: Cross country evidence. Journal of Business and Economics,, 4(1), 1-12.
Utrilla, P. N., Grande, F. A., & Lorenzo, D. (2015). The effects of coaching in employees and organizational performance: The Spanish Case. Intangible Capital,. 11(2), 166-189.
Vosloban, R. I. (2012). The Influence of the Employee's Performance on the company's growth-a managerial perspective. . Procedia economics and finance, 3, 660-665. .
Watson, J., Taylor, A., Haffman, T., Jorge, A., Sulivan, B., Chung, D., & Mahmood, A. (2009). Title of the Book. New York: Publisher.
Yuan, K. H. (2005). Fit indices versus test statistics. Multivariate behavioral research,. 40(1), 115-148.