Document Type : Original Research


1 Ph.D. student of government management, Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch, Sari, Iran

2 Assistant professor, Department of government management, Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch, Sari, Iran

3 Assistant professor, Department public administration, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan Branch, Gorgan, Iran


This study aims to identify the factors affecting productivity management and rank its improvements within government service organizations.  In terms of the type of data, this is a descriptive, applied, and inferential survey, and it is both qualitative and quantitative. This paper follows a three-step process. The theoretical sampling method was thus used to select a sample of 15 productivity experts from within the university and managers from government organizations in Tehran province for semi-structured interviews. It is a specialized sampling method. The interviews were analyzed using NVivo Plus software. Additionally, 102 items were derived from the interviews, based upon open coding, and classified into 21 sub-indexes and two main indices. As part of the second stage, the quantitative aspect of the research, Shannon Entropy, was used to determine the importance of various factors affecting productivity management. The third stage of ranking productivity improvement strategies in public service organizations utilized the MABAC method. The results showed that the indices of accountability, work experience, interdepartmental challenge, expertise and skill, flexibility, interdepartmental communication, training, workload, structure transparency, information and communication technology, organizational culture, safety and health, research and development, leadership style, innovation, and creativity, respectively, gained the highest degree of importance among the factors affecting the productivity management of government service organizations. Further, research findings indicate that improving service efficiency, improving service standards, improving service effectiveness, developing a program to improve service productivity, encouraging leadership involvement, and establishing periodic monitoring are the most effective strategies for improving productivity in government service organizations.


Main Subjects

©2022 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

AdibManesh, M., Mohammadi, Z., Nouri, A., Albuquerque, S., & Taheri, M. (2013). The relationship between the five major factors of personality and leadership style with the efficiency of educational services of school principals. Psychological Studies, 35(9), 83-102.
AminiKhiabani, G., & Hamdi, K. (2018). The relationship between market culture and human resource productivity; An explanation of the market approach in a business organization. Productivity Management (Beyond Management), 11(44), 157-179.
Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2014). Public Service Efficiency: Reframing the Debate. Routledge.
Armstrong, G., & Cutler, P. (2011). Principles of marketing.
Asadi, M. (2020). The effect of intellectual capital on job productivity of social emergency staff in Gilan province with regard to the role of organizational citizenship behavior Islamic Azad University, Bandar Anzali Branch]. Bandar Anzali.
AsianProductivityOrganization. (2018). Productivity.
Bagheri, R. (2010). Investigating the effective factors on improving the productivity of Gorgan Municipality services Allameh Tabatabai University]. Tehran.
BazarganHarandi, A., Hejazi, G., & Sarmad, Z. (2018). Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences. SAMT.
Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2006). Forecasting crashes: trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of financial Economics, 61(3), 345-381.
DanaeeFard, H., & Harati, H. (2014). Mechanisms of productivity Enhancement in Iran's Public Sector. Quarterly Journal of Public Organzations Management, 2(3), 7-24.
Denhardt, R., & Denhardt, J. (2003). The new public service: An approach to reform. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 3-10.
Durdyev, S., Ihtiyar, A., Ismail, S., Ahmad, F., & Bakar, N. A. (2014). Productivity and Service Quality: Factors Affecting in Service Industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 487-491
Faghihi, A., & MousaviKashi, Z. (2010). Productivity measurement model (effectiveness and efficiency) in the public service sector of Iran. Journal of Public Administration, 2(4), 107-126 (In Persian).
Fließ, S., & Kleinaltenkamp, M. (2004). Blueprinting the service company: Managing service processes efficiently. Journal of Business Research, 57(4), 392-404
Forsund, F. R. (2017). Measuring effectiveness of production in the public sector. Omega, 73, 93-103
Gumah, B., & Aziabah, M. A. (2020). Our Lives Are Affected by Government Agencies": Citizens' Perception Survey as a Measure of Public Service Efficiency in Ghana. SAGE Open, 10(2), 2158244020935900.
Jalilian, J., & Pajoohesh, S. (2018). Presenting the proposed model of quality of higher education system in knowledge production and entrepreneurship of knowledge-based economy 11th International Conference on Accounting and Management and 8th International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Open Innovation, Tehran.
Khaki, G. (2018). Productivity management cycle management (at national and organizational scale with human resources approach). Fuzhan.
Klassen, K. J., & Rohleder, T. R. (2001). Combining Operations and Marketing to Manage Capacity and Demand in Services. The Service Industries Journal, 21(2), 1-30
Kotler, P., Wong, V., Saunders, J., & Armstrong, G. (2007). Moderní marketing. Grada publishing
Loeppke, R., Taitel, M., Haufle, V., Parry, T., Kessler, R., & Jinnett, K. (2009). Health and Productivity as a Business Strategy: A Multiemployer Study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 51(4), 411-428
Manavarian, A., Gholipour, A., & Yazdani, H. (2005). The role of intellectual capital in the survival or destruction of organizations: A study on Bank Mellat. Iranian Management Sciences, 1(3), 37-64.
MotalebiVarkani, A., Mataji, R., & AliMohammadpour, A. (2018). The effect of leadership style on service productivity and process innovation considering the role of knowledge sharing moderation. Productivity Management, 45(12), 93-113.
Pamucar, D., & Cirovic, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028.
Rana, F., Arfan, A., Riaz, W., & Irfan, A. (2019). Impact of Accountability on Public Service Delivery efficiency. Journal of Public Value and Administrative Insight, 2(1), 7-9.
Robert, J., & Peter, J. (2004). Service productivity. Towards understanding the relationship between operational and customer productivity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(3), 201-213.
Rosta, A., Davar, V., & Ebrahimi, A. H. (2016). Marketing Management. SAMT.
Rutkauskas, J., & Paulavichiene, E. (2005). Concept of productivity in service sector. Engineering Economics,, 43(3), 35-41.
Sahay, B. S. (2005). Multi‐factor productivity measurement model for service organisation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 5, 25-35.
Scerri, M., & Agarwal, R. (2018). Service enterprise productivity in action: measuring service productivity. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(4), 524-551.