Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Hakim Nezami Institution of Higher Education, Quchan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Sir Padampat Singhania University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

Humans are having unlimited potential for growth and development which is measured in an organisation under Performance appraisal System (PAS). PAS is the process of analyzing and recording information about the relative worth of an employee, that is a two way communication process. It involves an active communication between employee and supervisor about performance. PAS can be measured by a system of evaluation but since there is no unanimous system exists the companies are using any one or their own system. Their system of PAS may be older one and sometime unable to measures the performance of the employees. Hence in this paper a company CCI is selected which has given the time and information to analyse their system and an improved system made by the researchers already were also used by taking a census survey of all employees of the company. To test the hypothesis independent sample t test was used with SPSS-19 software. It was found that the company’s current PA system has some hidden difficulties and the new system is able to measure the employees potential in well manner.

Keywords

Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (1998). Performance management: The new realities. State Mutual Book & Periodical Service.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human performance, 10(2), 99-109.
Chandra, A., & Frank, Z. D. (2004). Utilization of performance appraisal systems in health care organizations and improvement strategies for supervisors. The health care manager, 23(1), 25-30.
Chandra, B., Chouhan, V., & Goswami, S. (2012). Analyzing trends and profitability vis-à-vis working capital management (WCM): A study of select information technology (IT) organizations in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 6(7), 13-26.
Chandra, B., Goswami, S., & Chouhan, V. (2013). Investigating altitude towards online advertising on social media-an empirical study. Management Insight, 8(1), 1-14.
Chang, H. H. (2005). The influence of continuous improvement and performance factors in total quality organization. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 16(3), 413-437.
Chouhan, V. & Gorana, H. (2014). Analysing Consumer Decision making for FMCG products on basis of different culture: a case study of Rajasthan and Gujarat states, American International Journal of Research in Humanities. Arts and Social Sciences, 8(2), 217-222.
Chouhan, V. (2013). Global Convergence of Accounting Standard And Indian Perspective. International Journal of Research in Finance & Marketing, 33(7), 15-27.
Chouhan, V., & Naghshbandi, N. (2015). Measuring Employees Value: A Critical Study on Human Resources Accounting in India. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 2(4), 277-292.
Chouhan, V., & Verma, P. (2014). Improving effectiveness of Performance appraisal tool: Who thinks that it uses improved techniques. Business Spectrum, 4(1), 71-82
Chouhan, V., & Verma, P. (2014). Measuring validity of performance appraisal tools in Performance Appraisal System. Nirnay the Journal of Decision Science, 6(1), 57-64.
Chouhan, V., Chandra, B., & Goswami, S. (2014). Predicting financial stability of select BSE companies revisiting Altman Z score. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 15(2), 92-105.
Chouhan, V., Chandra, B., Goswami, S., & Verma, P. (2016). Analyzing the Performance Appraisal System of a Public Sector Organization in India: The Case of Rajasthan State Mines and Minerals Limited. IUP Journal of Management Research, 15(1), 48.
Chouhan, V., Verma, P., Sanghvi, H., & Gupta, A. (2013). Assessing Worker’s and Manager’s Perception on Judgment Accuracy in Performance Appraisal System (PAS). International Journal of Engineering, Business and Enterprise Applications (IJEBEA), 5(1), 95-99.
Fletcher, C., & Williams, R. (1985). Performance appraisal and career development. Hutchinson Radius.
Ivancevich, J. M. (1982). Subordinates' reactions to performance appraisal interviews: A test of feedback and goal-setting techniques. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(5), 581.
Jacobs, R., Kafry, D., & Zedeck, S. (1980). Expectations of behaviorally anchored rating scales. Personnel Psychology, 33(3), 595-640.
Khan, S., Chouhan, V., Chandra, B., & Goswami, S. (2012). Measurement of Value Creation Vis-À-Vis EVA: Analysis of Select BSE Companies. Pacific Business Review International, 5(3), 114-131.
Khan, S., Chouhan, V., Chandra, B., & Goswami, S. (2014). Sustainable accounting reporting practices of Indian cement industry: An exploratory study. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 2(2), 61-72.
Naghshbandi, N., Chouhan,V., Jain, P.(2016). Value based measurement of financial performance. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(2), 365-369.
Nemeroff, W. F., & Cosentino, J. (1979). Utilizing feedback and goal setting to increase performance appraisal interviewer skills of managers. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 566-576.
Peiperl, M. A. (2001). Getting 360 degrees feedback right. Harvard business review, 79(1), 142-7.
Sinclair, D., & Zairi, M. (1995). Effective process management through performance measurement: part I–applications of total quality-based performance measurement. Business Process Re-engineering & Management Journal, 1(1), 75-88.
Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1984). Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective. Research in personnel and human resources management, 2(8), 1-124.
Waldman, D. A. (1994). Designing performance management systems for total quality implementation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 7(2), 31-44.
Yahya, S., & Goh, W. K. (2002). Managing human resources toward achieving knowledge management. Journal of knowledge management, 6(5), 457-468.
Zairi, M., & Sinclair, D. (1995). Business process re-engineering and process management: a survey of current practice and future trends in integrated management. Management decision, 33(3), 3-16.