Document Type : Original Research


1 School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

2 School of International Studies, COLGIS, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia


This paper presents a conceptual framework to help in the interpretation or design of contingent valuation studies for improving river water quality in a developing country setting. An extensive literature review helped design this conceptual framework. Though the betterment of the river water quality has drawn the attention from various stakeholders, dearth of studies to deliver precise information about the value of the water quality appears a major drawback in developing countries to implement improvement plans. The major objective of this paper is to review the recent developments on non-market valuation e.g., contingent valuation method to design an appropriate economic valuation study for the river water quality. This study provides useful information which may help for further improvement of the water quality in an alike problem of developing countries. Future studies should validate empirically the proposed research framework.


Alberini, A., & Longo, A. (2006). Combining the travel cost and contingent behavior methods to value cultural heritage sites: Evidence from Armenia. Journal of Cultural Economics, 30(4), 287–304.
Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58(10), 4601–4614.
Bateman, I. (2004). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Edward Elgar. Retrieved from _GIzU8C
Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., … Özdemiroglu, E. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual.
Benson, M. C. (2006). An Economic Valuation of Improved Water Quality in Opequon Watershed, (April 2016).
Bingham, G., Bishop, R., Brody, M., Bromley, D., Clark, E. T., Cooper, W., Kellert, S. (1995). Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making. Ecological Economics, 14(2), 73–90.
Boyle, K. J., & Bishop, R. C. (1988). Welfare measurements using contingent valuation: a comparison of techniques. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(1), 20–28.
Cameron, T. A. (1988). A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15(3), 355–379.
Cameron, T. A., & James, M. D. (1987). Efficient estimation methods for" closed-ended" contingent valuation surveys. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 269–276.
Carson, R. T. (2000). Contingent valuation: A user’s guide. Environmental Science and Technology, 34(8), 1413–1418.
Carson, R. T. (2007). The Stated Preference Approach to Environmental Valuation: Applications: benefit-cost analysis and natural resource damage assessment. Ashgate. Retrieved from
Carson, R. T. (2012). Contingent valuation: A practical alternative when prices aren’t available. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 27–42.
Carson, R. T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). The Value of Clean Water’ The Public’s Willingness to Pay for and Swimmable Quality Water. Water Resources Research, 29(7), 2445–2454.
Carson, R. T., Mitchell, R. C., Hanemann, M., Kopp, R. J., Presser, S., & Ruud, P. A. (2003). Contingent valuation and lost passive use: damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25(3), 257–286.
Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J., & Brown, T. C. (2012). A primer on nonmarket valuation (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J., Brown, T. C., & Peterson, L. G. (2003). A primer on nonmarket valuation (Vol. 3). Springer.
Chee, Y. E. (2004). An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation.
Choe, K., Whittington, D., & Lauria, D. T. (1996). The economic benefits of surface water quality improvements in developing countries: a case study of Davao, Philippines. Land Economics, 72(4), 519–537.
Daily, G. (1997). Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press.
Diamond, P. a, & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64.
Dong, Y. (2012). Contingent valuation of Yangtze finless porpoises in Poyang Lake, China. Contingent Valuation of Yangtze Finless Porpoises in Poyang Lake, China. Springer Science & Business Media.
Durand-Morat, A., Wailes, E. J., & Nayga, R. M. (2016). Challenges of Conducting Contingent Valuation Studies in Developing Countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(2), 597–609.
Farber, S. C., Costanza, R., & Wilson, M. A. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 375–392.
Flores, N. E. (2003). Conceptual framework for nonmarket valuation. In A primer on nonmarket valuation (pp. 27–58). Springer.
Freeman III, A. M., Herriges, J. A., & Kling, C. L. (2014). The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Routledge.
Freeman, A. (1979). The Benefits of Environmental Improvement: Theory and Practice. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Freeman, A. M. (1993). The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Measurement. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Garrod, G., & Willis, K. G. (1999). Economic valuation of the environment. Books.
Gunatilake, H. (2003). Environmental valuation: theory and applications. Sri Lanka: Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya.
Haab, T. C., McConnell, K. E. (2002). Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hanemann, W. M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? The American Economic Review, 81(3), 635–647.
Hanley, N., & Spash, C. L. (1993). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment (Vol. 499). Edward Elgar Aldershot.
Haque, A. K. E., Murty, M. N., & Shyamsundar, P. (2011). Environmental Valuation in South Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Hermoso, V., Filipe, A. F., Segurado, P., & Beja, P. (2015). Filling gaps in a large reserve network to address freshwater conservation needs. Journal of Environmental Management, 161, 358–365.
Huang, J.-C., Haab, T. C., & Whitehead, J. C. (1997). Willingness to pay for quality improvements: Should revealed and stated preference data be combined? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34(3), 240–255.
Keeler, B. L., Polasky, S., Brauman, K. A., Johnson, K. A., Finlay, J. C., O’Neill, A., … Dalzell, B. (2012). Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(45), 18619–18624.
Krutilla, J. V. (1967). Conservation reconsidered. The American Economic Review, 57(4), 777–786.
Majumdar, S., Deng, J., Zhang, Y., & Pierskalla, C. (2011). Using contingent valuation to estimate the willingness of tourists to pay for urban forests: A study in Savannah, Georgia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(4), 275–280.
Marsh, D. K. (2009). Willingness to pay for water quality in the Karapiro catchment – a case study of residents, (July).
Mendelsohn, R., & Olmstead, S. (2009). The Economic Valuation of Environmental Amenities and Disamenities: Methods and Applications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 325–347.
Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (2013). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Rff Press.
Mitchell, R., & Carson, R. (1981). An experiment in determining willingness to pay for national water quality improvements. Draft Report to the US Environmental.
Mitchell, R., & Carson, R. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method.
Nallathiga, R., & Paravasthu, R. (2010). Economic value of conserving river water quality: Results from a contingent valuation survey in Yamuna river basin, India. Water Policy, 12(2), 260–271.
Ndebele, T. (2009). Economic non-market valuation techniques: theory and application to ecosystems and ecosystem services: A case study of the restoration and preservation of Pekapeka Swamp : an application of the contingent valuation method in measuring the economic value. (MPhil Thesis, Massey University). Retrieved from
Ojeda, M. M. I., Mayer, A. A. S., & Solomon, B. B. D. (2008). Economic valuation of environmental services sustained by water flows in the Yaqui River Delta. Ecological Economics, 65(1), 155–166.
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., … Stromberg, J. C. (1997). The Natural Flow Regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration N. BioScience, 47(11), 769–784.
Portney, P. R. (1994). The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 3–17.
Sarkar, U. K., Pathak, A. K., & Lakra, W. S. (2008). Conservation of freshwater fish resources of India: new approaches, assessment and challenges. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17(10), 2495–2511.
Terer, T., Ndiritu, G. G., & Gichuki, N. N. (2004). Socio-economic values and traditional strategies of managing wetland resources in Lower Tana River, Kenya. Hydrobiologia.
Wang, H., Shi, Y., Kim, Y., & Kamata, T. (2013). Valuing water quality improvement in China: A case study of Lake Puzhehei in Yunnan Province. Ecological Economics.
Ward, F. A., & Michelsen, A. (2002). The economic value of water in agriculture: Concepts and policy applications. Water Policy, 4(5), 423–446.
Wattage, P., & Mardle, S. (2008). Total economic value of wetland conservation in Sri Lanka identifying use and non-use values. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 16(5), 359–369.
Wilson, M. A., & Carpenter, S. R. (1999). Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971-1997. Ecological Applications, 9(3), 772–783.
Zandersen, M., Bartczak, A., Czajkowski, M., Giergiczny, M., & Termansen, M. (2012). Guide on Economic Instruments & Non-market Valuation Methods. Warsaw Ecological Economic Center.
Zedler, J. B., & Kercher, S. (2005). WETLAND RESOURCES: Status, Trends, Ecosystem Services, and Restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 39–74.
Zimmer, D., & Renault, D. (2003). Virtual water in food production and global trade: Review of methodological issues and preliminary results. In Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade, Value of Water Research Report Series (Vol. 12, pp. 1–19).