The General Review of Dualities Theory in Managing Organizational Change

Document Type: Review Article

Authors

1 Centre of Southern New Hampshire (SNHU) Programs, HELP College Art and Technologies, 55200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

2 Centre of Southern New Hampshire (SNHU) Programs HELP College Art and Technologies, 55200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Abstract

This article is about how duality theory is perceived by leaders and how we should focus on its element. It is important because organization tend to underestimate the importance of dualities. This research will show that duality thinking provides us the knowledge to handle opposing values and appreciating the concept on utilizing it. It is a paradox that needs identifying and explaining in an attempt to understand how to mediate between two opposing poles. This article will provide a basic understanding on how paradoxes are managed and by balancing the duality tension what possible effectiveness will occur.

Keywords


Achtenhagen, L. and L. Melin (2003), Managing the homogeneity-heterogeneity duality. In: Pettigrew, A.M. et al. (eds.) (2003), Innovative forms of organizing. International perspectives, Sage Publications, London.
Barry. S(2014), Dynamic Capability Seen through a Duality–Paradox Lens: A Case of Radical Innovation at Microsoft, in Abraham B. (Rami) Shani , Debra A. Noumair (ed.) Research in Organizational Change and Development (Research in Organizational Change and Development, Volume 22) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 141 – 189
Biloslavo, R., Bagnoli, C., Figelj, R.R. (2013). Managing dualities for efficiency and effectiveness of organisations. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 3, 423-442.
Cameron, k.S., & Quinn, R.E. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. E. Quinn & K.S. Cameron. (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 554-568). Cambridge, MA: Ballinget
Cunha, M.P., Cunha, J.V., Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(3), 299-341.
Evans, P. (1999). HRM on the edge: A duality perspective. Organization, 6(2), 325-338.
Externbrink, K., Wilkens, U., Lienert, A. (2013). Antecedents to the Successful Coordination of IPS2Networks – A Dynamic Capability Perspective on Complex Work Systems in the Engineering Sector. In: Shimomura Y, Kimita K (eds). The Philosopher's Stone for Sustainability. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 103-108.
Ferlie, E. (2007). “Complex organizations and contemporary public sector organizations”. International Public Management Journal, 10(2), 153-165.
Ford, J., & Backoff, R. (1988). Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. In R. E. Quinn & K.S. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 81-121). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Galunic, D. C. and K. M. Eisenhardt (2001) 'Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms', The Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1229-1249.
Garud, R., Jain, S., Tuertscher, P. (2008). Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness. Organization Studies, 29(3), 351-371.
Graetz,F. & Smith,A. (2008). The role of dualities in arbitrating continuity and change in forms of organizing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(3), 265-280
Jackson, W. (1999).  'Dualism, Duality and the Complexity of Economic Institutions', International Journal of Social Economics, 26(4), 545-558.
Kimberly Stoltzfus, Cynthia Stohl, David R. Seibold, (2011) "Managing organizational change: paradoxical problems, solutions, and consequences", Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 24 Iss: 3, pp.349 – 367
Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. and Carroll, T. (1999) The coevolution of new organizational forms, Organization Science, 10(5), 535–550
March, J. G. (1996) Continuity and change in theories of organizational action, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 278–287.
Mason, R. (2007). “The external environment’s effect on management and strategy. A complexity theory approach”. Management Decision, 45(1), 10-28.
Paul Boselie, Chris Brewster, Jaap Paauwe, (2009) "In search of balance – managing the dualities of HRM: an overview of the issues", Personnel Review, Vol. 38 Iss: 5, 461 – 471
Pettigrew, A. M. and E. M. (1988) Fenton.Complexities and Dualities in Innovative Forms of Organizing. The Innovating Organization. A. M. Pettigrew and E. M. Fenton. London, Sage Publications: 279-300.
R.T. Rockafellar and P.R. Wolenski, “Convexity in Hamilton-Jacobi theory I: dynamics and duality,” SIAM J. Control and Opt. 39 (2001), 1323–1350.
Roberto B, Carlo B, Roland R. F, (2013) "Managing dualities for efficiency and effectiveness of organisations", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 113 Iss: 3, 423 – 442
Sutherland, F. and A. C. T. Smith (2011). "Duality Theory and the Management of the Change– Stability Paradox." Journal of Management & Organization, 17 (4): 534-547.
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Rganization Science, 13(5), 567-582.
Vera, D., Crossan, M. (2007). Reconciling learning paradoxes through improvisation. In: Actes de la conférence Organizational Learning Knowledge and Capabilities Learning Fusion.
Yanow, D., Tsoukas, H. (2009). What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 1339-1346.